[Rigf_program] contribution on national/regional IGFs to IGF open consultation May 21

[Kabani]

Adam,

Agree with your proposal, as It says the same what I wanted to add.

"National and regional IGFs are essential building blocks of the global
IGF"  - Done

Sincerely

Asif Kabani


*Asif Kabani, MBA*
*
*
*Connect @*
[image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/kabani.asif> [image:
Twitter]<https://twitter.com/Kabaniasif>
 [image: Youtube] <http://www.youtube.com/user/asifkabani> [image:
LinkedIn]<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kabani>

*Before you print - Think about the** **ENVIRONMENT*



On 15 May 2013 19:32, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> How about adding a new opening sentence, simply:
>
> National and regional IGFs are essential building blocks of the global IGF.
>
> And then continue as the earlier draft I circulated.
>
> I think best not to make too many changes as we had the proposed text
> read into the record during the last call.
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Kabani <kabani.asif at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Adam,
> >
> > I mean somethings on these lines, (May be), if possible to be
> incorporated as follows:
> >
> > "We Very strong support sustainability of IGF  with Multi stakeholder
> with better integration of regional and National IGFs.  Since last few
> years  we haven't found yet the right format of integrating the Regional /
> National IGF, this gives us the opportunity now based on the WSIS
> principles and demand in IGF meetings to put regional and national IGFs on
> the maps of IGF events in context."
> >
> > Sincerely
> >
> > Asif Kabani, MBA
> >
> > Connect @
> >
> > Before you print - Think about the ENVIRONMENT
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15 May 2013 15:27, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Asif,
> >>
> >> Sorry, I don't understand what you are suggesting.  Could you send some
> text.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Kabani <kabani.asif at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Adam,
> >>>
> >>> Many thanks for sharing, suggestion that para 2 need re-written in
> contexts of IGF and WSIS principles, example Markus  Kummer, ISOC and Bill
> Graham, ICANN and other participants in WSIS 2013 this week also supported
> the National and Regional IGFs. Suggestion is that let IGF give the process
> and guidelines, your suggestion and process are much appreciated. The
> suggestion are my personal views on the subject.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely
> >>>
> >>> @Kabaniasif
> >>>
> >>> Asif Kabani, MBA
> >>>
> >>> Connect @
> >>>
> >>> Before you print - Think about the ENVIRONMENT
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 15 May 2013 12:42, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless there are any objections, I propose to sent the following text
> >>>> on national/regional IGFs as a contribution from us to the open
> >>>> consultation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Adam
> >>>>
> >>>> Proposal for a National and Regional IGF session, Bali IGF.
> >>>> Contribution from the APrIGF multi-stakeholder steering committee, for
> >>>> the IGF open consultation, 21 May 2013, Geneva.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There should be a session in Bali to allow national/regional IGFs to
> >>>> share and discuss information about the outcomes of their meetings.
> >>>>
> >>>> We suggest that the coordinators of each national/regional activity
> >>>> are invited to join a coordinating group, which will work with the MAG
> >>>> and IGF Secretariat to arrange the session.
> >>>>
> >>>> The coordinating group should prepare a standard reporting format.
> >>>> Reports of each national/regional activity should be prepared in
> >>>> advance of the session and made available on the IGF website. The
> >>>> coordinating group will produce an initial analysis of the
> >>>> regional/national IGFs reports submitted. The analysis will be an
> >>>> input for the dialogue.  Each report can be briefly introduced during
> >>>> a "reporting-in" part of the session.
> >>>>
> >>>> We emphasize that the main purpose of the session should be to allow
> >>>> discussion between the respective national/regional activities.
> >>>> Reporting-in from the national/regional IGFs should be kept to a
> >>>> minimum. Discussion should seek to identify the commonality of views
> >>>> across the different regions/countries, and at the same time identify
> >>>> the unique elements that arise from each process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Based on the input reports, initial analysis and discussion, an
> >>>> outcome report identifying areas of commonality and difference should
> >>>> be prepared by the coordinating group as an output of the session. The
> >>>> outcome report will go beyond identification/comparison to provide a
> >>>> more substantive analysis; for example on common challenges faced,
> >>>> different/local interpretations of same topics, etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Session features:  a substantive session that focuses on dialogue not
> >>>> reporting.  Written reports, to a pre-agreed format, required from
> >>>> each process must be submitted before the Bali IGF.  Brief
> >>>> reporting-in from each national/regional activity important.  Session
> >>>> outcome report to be prepared.
> >>>>
> >>>> END
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Rigf_program mailing list
> >>>> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> >>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130515/75b1693d/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program