[Rigf_program] contribution on national/regional IGFs to IGF open consultation May 21

Thu May 16 13:04:48 HKT 2013

I really like that suggestion, simple and bold.

From: Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp<mailto:ajp at glocom.ac.jp>>
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:32 AM
To: "kabani.asif at gmail.com<mailto:kabani.asif at gmail.com>" <kabani.asif at gmail.com<mailto:kabani.asif at gmail.com>>
Cc: program <program at aprigf.asia<mailto:program at aprigf.asia>>
Subject: Re: [Rigf_program] contribution on national/regional IGFs to IGF open consultation May 21

How about adding a new opening sentence, simply:

National and regional IGFs are essential building blocks of the global IGF.

And then continue as the earlier draft I circulated.

I think best not to make too many changes as we had the proposed text
read into the record during the last call.

Best,

Adam

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Kabani <kabani.asif at gmail.com<mailto:kabani.asif at gmail.com>> wrote:

Adam,

I mean somethings on these lines, (May be), if possible to be incorporated as follows:

"We Very strong support sustainability of IGF  with Multi stakeholder with better integration of regional and National IGFs.  Since last few years  we haven't found yet the right format of integrating the Regional / National IGF, this gives us the opportunity now based on the WSIS principles and demand in IGF meetings to put regional and national IGFs on the maps of IGF events in context."

Sincerely

Asif Kabani, MBA

Connect @

Before you print - Think about the ENVIRONMENT

On 15 May 2013 15:27, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp<mailto:ajp at glocom.ac.jp>> wrote:

Hi Asif,

Sorry, I don't understand what you are suggesting.  Could you send some text.

Thanks,

Adam

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Kabani <kabani.asif at gmail.com<mailto:kabani.asif at gmail.com>> wrote:

Adam,

Many thanks for sharing, suggestion that para 2 need re-written in contexts of IGF and WSIS principles, example Markus  Kummer, ISOC and Bill Graham, ICANN and other participants in WSIS 2013 this week also supported the National and Regional IGFs. Suggestion is that let IGF give the process and guidelines, your suggestion and process are much appreciated. The suggestion are my personal views on the subject.

Sincerely

@Kabaniasif

Asif Kabani, MBA

Connect @

Before you print - Think about the ENVIRONMENT

On 15 May 2013 12:42, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp<mailto:ajp at glocom.ac.jp>> wrote:

Hi everyone,

Unless there are any objections, I propose to sent the following text
on national/regional IGFs as a contribution from us to the open
consultation.

Best,

Adam

Proposal for a National and Regional IGF session, Bali IGF.
Contribution from the APrIGF multi-stakeholder steering committee, for
the IGF open consultation, 21 May 2013, Geneva.

There should be a session in Bali to allow national/regional IGFs to
share and discuss information about the outcomes of their meetings.

We suggest that the coordinators of each national/regional activity
are invited to join a coordinating group, which will work with the MAG
and IGF Secretariat to arrange the session.

The coordinating group should prepare a standard reporting format.
Reports of each national/regional activity should be prepared in
advance of the session and made available on the IGF website. The
coordinating group will produce an initial analysis of the
regional/national IGFs reports submitted. The analysis will be an
input for the dialogue.  Each report can be briefly introduced during
a "reporting-in" part of the session.

We emphasize that the main purpose of the session should be to allow
discussion between the respective national/regional activities.
Reporting-in from the national/regional IGFs should be kept to a
minimum. Discussion should seek to identify the commonality of views
across the different regions/countries, and at the same time identify
the unique elements that arise from each process.

Based on the input reports, initial analysis and discussion, an
outcome report identifying areas of commonality and difference should
be prepared by the coordinating group as an output of the session. The
outcome report will go beyond identification/comparison to provide a
more substantive analysis; for example on common challenges faced,
different/local interpretations of same topics, etc.

Session features:  a substantive session that focuses on dialogue not
reporting.  Written reports, to a pre-agreed format, required from
each process must be submitted before the Bali IGF.  Brief
reporting-in from each national/regional activity important.  Session
outcome report to be prepared.

END
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia<mailto:Rigf_program at aprigf.asia>
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program

_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia<mailto:Rigf_program at aprigf.asia>
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program

--

Sylvia Cadena  |  Community Awards and Grants Specialist | sylvia at apnic.net
ISIF  Asia Information Society Innovation Fund

Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC)
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646
Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7  3858 3199
http://www.apnic.net | http://www.isif.asia

sip: sylvia at voip.apnic.net
skype: sylviacadena
https://www.facebook.com/ISIF.asia
http://gplusme.at/ISIFAsia
Twitter @ISIF_Asia

* Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130516/04f9de44/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program