[Rigf_program] Initial APrIGF proposal evaluation results

[Dongman Lee]

Paul & members,

Looks great! I'd like to add two comments now since I may not bel able 
to attend tomorrow's meeting:

- Instead of merging 14, 18, and 22 into one, I think having two 
consecutive sessions (14+22 and 18) would be better - we explore and 
discuss the government's roles and IG status in AP in the first session 
and then talk about how the current  regulations can be improved for a 
better shape of IG in the following session.

- cyber security is one of key foci's of Korean government so please 
have the proposals related to this reconsidered for selection.

Regards,

Dongman


2013-07-04 ?? 3:46, Paul Wilson ? ?:
> Hi all,
>
> The APrIGF proposals have been evaluated by 11 of the committee members (Thanks!) and the results are attached.
>
> Note that the "threshold" rating value can be adjusted to vary the number of accepted proposals.
>
> Clearly some of the proposals could be merged, and I've given my own initial suggestions in the attached.
>
> I suggest that tomorrow we need to discuss the next steps with this process so that the selection can be finalised soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130704/f4cade1a/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program