[Rigf_program] Initial APrIGF proposal evaluation results

[kilnam chon]

my comments;

1. ipv6; 4 and 15
    multiple workshops in series; 15 in the morning, and 4 in two slots in
the afternoon

    remark:  tutorial/20 may be place in the first time slot along any
other tutorials, i.e, all tutorials
                  in the first slot in the morning.

                  are we giving APrIGF orientation meeting?

2. open data: 10 and 24
    mutltiple workshops in series, not to merge.
    may add the third one, too without merging.

3. multistakeholder workshops
    multiple workshops in series, not to merge.

A. diversity
    shall we have the diversity guideline (or requirement) of "3 countires
and/or 3 stakeholders"?

chon

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The APrIGF proposals have been evaluated by 11 of the committee members
> (Thanks!) and the results are attached.
>
> Note that the "threshold" rating value can be adjusted to vary the number
> of accepted proposals.
>
> Clearly some of the proposals could be merged, and I've given my own
> initial suggestions in the attached.
>
> I suggest that tomorrow we need to discuss the next steps with this
> process so that the selection can be finalised soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130705/4362f70a/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program