[Rigf_program] operating principles, proposed text on quorum etc

[Fouad Bajwa]

Hi Adam,

Are we till going to call the multistakeholder a steering group? I had
shared earlier that this was a very confusing term. A multistakeholder led
process being steered? The advisory approach that is common around other
regional and country IGF's should be considered. There is no harm in having
a MAG here. The ArabIGF also adoption the MAG term for its multistakeholder
group.

Best


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> Cheryl and I offered to edit the text of the draft operating
> principles, section 6, membership, about "quorum".  We propose as new:
>
> For the affirmative vote to be quorate 3 of the 4 recognized
> stakeholder groupings, as identified in section 4 "Organizational
> Principles" of this document; Must have at least 5 votes cast by
> individuals having previously established their Stakeholder Group
> affiliation.
>
> (old text:  The quorum for any vote or decision by the MSG will be set
> at 20 voting members, with at least 2 individuals having established
> affiliation with each recognised stakeholder grouping.)
>
> Minium 20 members must vote, 5 members from 3 of the 4 groups.
>
> Comments please,
>
> Adam
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>



-- 
Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
ICT4D and Internet Governance Advisor
My Blog: Internet's Governance: http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/
Follow my Tweets: http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130402/8a3c3018/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program