[Rigf_program] National/Regional IGF session proposal

Fouad Bajwa fouadbajwa at gmail.com
Wed May 8 18:54:10 HKT 2013 

I believe that a mailing list has been created by the IGF secretariat
focusing on regional IGF coordination that can be joining by the people
involved with regional IGF meetings and want to report back or provide
feedback to the IGF.


On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> The MAG is now discussing how to include national and regional IGFs in
> the Bali meeting.  Suggestion so far is for a coordinating group, led
> by MAG members.  I suggest we still submit a proposal about a session
> and have updated the draft I sent after our last call.  Sylvia, hope I
> caught and included your comments.
>
> Do we have a call on Friday?
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
> Proposal for a National and Regional IGF session at Bali IGF.
> Contribution from the APrIGF multi-stakeholder steering committee, for
> the IGF open consultation, 21 May 2013, Geneva.
>
> There should be a session in Bali to allow national/regional IGFs to
> share and discuss information about the outcomes of their meetings.
>
> We suggest that the coordinators of each national/regional activity
> are invited to join a coordinating group, which will work with the MAG
> and IGF Secretariat to arrange the session.
>
> The coordinating group should prepare a standard reporting format.
> Reports of each national/regional activity should be prepared in
> advance of the session and made available on the IGF website. The
> coordinating group will produce an initial analysis of the
> regional/national IGFs reports submitted. The analysis will be an
> input for the dialogue.  Each report can be briefly introduced during
> a "reporting-in" part of the session.
>
> We suggest that the main purpose of the session should be to allow
> discussion between the respective national/regional activities.
> Discussion should seek to identify the commonality of views across the
> different regions/countries, and at the same time identify the unique
> elements that arise from each process.
>
> Based on the input reports, initial analysis and discussion, an
> outcome report identifying areas of commonality and difference should
> be prepared by the coordinating group as an output of the session. The
> outcome report will go beyond identification/comparison to provide a
> more substantive analysis; for example on common challenges faced,
> different/local interpretations of same topics, etc.
>
> Session features:  a substantive session that focuses on dialogue not
> reporting.  Written reports, to a pre-agreed format, required from
> each process must be submitted before the Bali IGF.  Brief
> reporting-in from each national/regional activity important.  Session
> outcome report to be prepared.
>
> END
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Sylvia Cadena <sylvia at apnic.net> wrote:
> > Dear Adam and all…
> >
> > Just wanted to make a small suggestion here… it will be great if the
> > coordinating group as proposed by Adam, does some preparatory work and
> > offers an initial analysis of the regional/national IGFs reports
> submitted.
> > The analysis will be an input for the dialogue, to do the "identifying
> areas
> > of commonality and difference" prior to the session, as well as
> challenges
> > and results. The outcome report will then go beyond
> > identification/comparison to provide a more substantive analysis. For
> > example on common challenges faced, different/local interpretations of
> same
> > topics, etc. I believe the role of that coordinating group proposed is
> > critical to ensure that the session goes beyond just long reports on a
> > session competing for attention from other sessions.
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Sylvia
> >
> >
> > From: "Ang Peng Hwa (Prof)" <TPHANG at ntu.edu.sg>
> > Date: Saturday, 27 April 2013 3:06 AM
> > To: Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>, APrIGF PC <program at ap.rigf.asia>
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Rigf_program] National/Regional IGF session proposal
> >
> > Adam and PC members,
> >
> > May I suggest holding off on this just a little bit. Let me check with
> > Marilyn Cade. She seems to have been tasked with running this.
> >
> > In Kenya, such a session was on the main IGF programme. But in Baku, it
> > became a parallel session. As it was, there was not enough time for
> national
> > and regional presentations. I imagine that there would be even more
> national
> > IGFs in Bali.
> >
> > My dissatisfaction with the format is that with so many diverse views, it
> > became more noise than signal. You leave the session no better informed
> than
> > not attending it.
> >
> > Allow me a couple of days to get back on this.
> >
> > Peng Hwa
> >
> > From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com>
> > Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 8:27 PM
> > To: Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
> > Cc: APrIGF PC <program at ap.rigf.asia>
> > Subject: Re: [Rigf_program] National/Regional IGF session proposal
> >
> > Thanks for this Adam,
> >
> > This draft text works well for me and most importantly reflects well the
> > sentiments and desires for this proposed session at the Bali IGF that
> > wasvdiscussed in our APrIGF organising committee meeting held earlier
> today
> > and  has therefore got my support as text (subject to any edits peoposed
> > from the list discussions and agreed to by our consensus) to be
> forwarded as
> > appropriate, when possible, in responce to the expected call for input to
> > the IGF open consultation in May...
> >
> > CLO from my Mobile phone
> >
> > On 26/04/2013 7:02 PM, "Adam Peake" <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> We discussed sending a proposal for the open consultation about this
> >> year's main session on regional and national IGFs.  Some ideas about
> >> such a contribution below.
> >>
> >> As yet, there doesn't seem to be a process for making comment for the
> >> IGF open consultation, Geneva, 21 May.  I expect something will be
> >> posted soon.
> >>
> >> edit/comment please.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>
> >> Proposal for Regional and National session (Bali IGF)
> >> Contribution from the APrIGF multi-stakeholder steering committee, IGF
> >> open consultation, 21 May.
> >>
> >> There should be a session in Bali to allow national/regional IGFs to
> >> share and discuss information about the outcomes of their meetings.
> >>
> >> We suggest that the coordinators of each national/regional activity be
> >> invited to join a coordinating group, which will work with the MAG and
> >> IGF Secretariat to arrange the session.
> >>
> >> The coordinating group should prepare a standard reporting format.
> >> Reports of each national/regional activity should be prepared in
> >> advance of the session and made available on the IGF website.  Each
> >> report can be briefly introduced during a "reporting-in" part of the
> >> session.
> >>
> >> We suggest that the main purpose of the session should be to allow
> >> discussion between the respective national/regional activities.
> >> Discussion should seek to identify the commonality of views across the
> >> different regions/countries, and at the same time identify the unique
> >> elements that arise from each process.
> >>
> >> A collected paper of outcomes identifying areas of commonality and
> >> difference should be prepared by the coordinating group as an output
> >> of the session.
> >>
> >> Features:  a substantive session that focuses on dialogue not
> >> reporting.  Written reports, to a pre-agreed format, required from
> >> each process must be submitted before the Bali IGF.  Brief
> >> reporting-in from each national/regional activity important.  Session
> >> outcome document to be prepared.  3 hours session.
> >>
> >> END
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rigf_program mailing list
> >> Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
> >> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > CONFIDENTIALITY:This email is intended solely for the person(s) named and
> > may be confidential and/or privileged.If you are not the intended
> > recipient,please delete it,notify us and do not copy,use,or disclose its
> > content.
> >
> > Towards A Sustainable Earth:Print Only When Necessary.Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Sylvia Cadena  |  Community Awards and Grants Specialist |
> sylvia at apnic.net
> > ISIF  Asia Information Society Innovation Fund
> >
> > Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC)
> > 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646
> > Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7 3858 3199
> > http://www.apnic.net | http://www.isif.asia
> >
> > sip: sylvia at voip.apnic.net
> > skype: sylviacadena
> > https://www.facebook.com/ISIF.asia
> > http://gplusme.at/ISIFAsia
> > Twitter @ISIF_Asia
> >
> > * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rigf_program mailing list
> > Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> > https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>



-- 
Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
ICT4D and Internet Governance Advisor
My Blog: Internet's Governance: http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/
Follow my Tweets: http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130508/c6073868/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program

More information about the Rigf_secretariat mailing list