[Rigf_program] Promoting APrIGF in INET Bangkok?

Fri Jun 7 14:15:23 HKT 2013

Hi all,

I am also at INET Bangkok and seeing pamphlets from APrIGF at ISOC booth.
Will do to help.

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:

> Hi again Thip,
>
> We've had an interesting discussion here in the APrIGF meeting, about a
> perceived need for more diversity in the proposals to APrIGF, which can
> still be submitted during the next 7 days, for a deadline on 14 June.
>
> To promote more proposals in the time available, could we call on you
> please to promote the CFP during the INET meeting in Bangkok?
>
> The link is here:
>
>    http://2013.rigf.asia/2013/05/23/call-for-workshops-themes/
>
> Thanks very much,
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> On 07/06/2013, at 12:07 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Thip, I fully understand, and wish you good luck with the meeting!
> >
> >
> > FYI all,
> >
> > The INET Bangkok meeting is happening for the next 3 days, and you can
> see the webcast here:
> >
> > http://www.internetsociety.org/inet-bangkok/webcast
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/06/2013, at 9:19 AM, Duangthip Chomprang <chomprang at isoc.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> I am sorry to report that I will not be able to at ten today's call as
> I am hosting INET Bangkok 2013 today and tomorrow. I shall be joining all
> future meetings. My apologies and please excuse me.
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >> Thip
> >> On 6 Jun 2556 BE, at 09:38, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> here is a proposal for a lightweight evaluation system for APrIGF
> proposals.
> >>>
> >>> for discussion tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> i will shortly also share a Google spreadsheet which should give a
> better idea of how the ratings system would work.
> >>>
> >>> Paul.
> >>> ===
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> APrIGF Proposal evaluation system - Draft
> >>>
> >>> Paul Wilson
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Criteria for Evaluation
> >>> -----------------------
> >>>
> >>> Proposals will be evaluation according to 3 criteria, interpreted
> according to the following guidance:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Relevance
> >>>
> >>> Is the proposal relevant to the themes of this APrIGF meeting?  Are
> the themes clearly stated and/or evident in the proposal?  Are the specific
> issues to be addressed by the proposal also clear and relevant?
> >>>
> >>> 2. Completeness
> >>>
> >>> Does the proposal provide all information as requested in the CFP,
> specifically:  discussion theme and issues, format and approach, and
> panelists.  Is this information clear and complete enough to properly
> describe an acceptable proposal?  Does it appear than panellists are
> actually confirmed, or are they just invited, or only proposed?
> >>>
> >>> 3. Diversity
> >>>
> >>> Does the proposal include panelists and viewpoints from multiple
> stakeholder perspectives, from multiple geographic, economic or cultural
> perspectives?  Are all panelists properly qualified to represent one or
> more distinct stakeholder groups?  Do the proposed panellists contribute to
> the overall diversity and multi-stakeholder representation of the APrIGF
> event?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Each proposal will be evaluated on each criterial, with a score
> between 0 and 3 as follows:
> >>>
> >>> 3 = criteria is fully satisfied
> >>> 2 = acceptable
> >>> 1 = needs improvement
> >>> 0 = absent
> >>>
> >>> (giving each proposal a total score between 0 and 9)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Selection Committee
> >>> -------------------
> >>>
> >>> A volunteer subcommittee (Selection Committee) of the MSG will be
> assembled for the purpose of rating the proposals, as follows:
> >>>
> >>> 1. After a call issued by the MSG chair, volunteers will submit their
> names and stakeholder affiliation to the MSG mailing list
> >>>
> >>> 2. Names will be accepted in order of appearance on the list,
> providing that no single stakeholder grouping is represented by more than
> 40% or less than 20% of committee members.
> >>>
> >>> 3. Up to 21 volunteers will be accepted by this means (less if the
> deadline passes before reaching this number)
> >>>
> >>> 4. The selected members of the Selection Committee will be published
> on the MSG mailing list.
> >>>
> >>> Committee members serve in their individual capacity to further the
> aims and success of the APrIGF, and not in a representative capacity for
> their stakeholder grouping or organisation.
> >>>
> >>> Proposal Ratings
> >>> ----------------
> >>>
> >>> Following the assembly of the selection committee, committee members
> will submit their proposal ratings to the APrIGF secretariat, using the
> agreed ratings form. After the deadline for submission, the secretariat
> will publish a report of proposals showing the anonymised ratings received,
> average rating, and rank order from highest to lowest average rating.   The
> ratings given by specific (named) individual committee members will not be
> published.
> >>>
> >>> Selection Process
> >>> -----------------
> >>>
> >>> As its next meeting after publication of proposal ratings, the MSG
> will consider the list of rated proposals and select proposals in order of
> average rating, in consideration of diversity of the proposals, and
> possible merger of proposals which involve duplication of content, theme or
> issue.
> >>>
> >>> During this discussion, selection committee members may modify their
> ratings, providing this can be achieved in a secure real-time manner.
> >>>
> >>> The final decision of the MSG will be made by consensus.  MSG members
> with personal involvement in any proposal (as proponent, panelist, subject,
> or otherwise) may participate in the discussion but may not block not the
> consensus of the MSG.
> >>>
> >>> After this meeting, the selected proposals (including proposals for
> mergers) will be published on the MSG mailing list and APrIGF website.
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Rigf_program mailing list
> >>> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> >>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
> >>
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
>

-- 
TH Schee
Co-Founder, FERTTA COMMUNICATIONS
M: +886-970-690294, +1-650-4884556
www.fertta.com | @scheeinfo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130607/7013f3ee/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program