[Rigf_program] on 2013 APrIGF program

[Save Vocea]

Dear Paul,

Hi all. I was on my first teleconference call with this group last week and hinted that ICANN will want to submit a proposal before the deadline (do appreciate that proposal deadline was extended).

We are also discussing participation from some of our key leadership team and what we could offer. 

I'm sorry that I may be late for this next call today or may miss it because of a scheduling clash. 

Regards,
Save
ICANN 
--Sent from my iPhone.
PS. Any unintended / misspelt words attributed to iPhones 'smart' auto-complete software. 

On 06/06/2013, at 4:25 PM, "Paul Wilson" <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:

> Dear Kilnam,
> 
> Thanks for these suggestions.
> 
> I suggest that we discuss during today's teleconference (0400 UTC), so I'll ask Yannis to put this on the agenda.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/06/2013, at 11:02 AM, kilnam chon <chonkn at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> let me propose on the program based on the past program as well as
>> korean proposal;
>> 
>> 1. starting time 
>>    9:30 as korean host proposed (and finish the last session at 6pm)
>>    remark:  office hour starts at 9am in korea, and it is not convenient to
>>                  start at 9am even though we don't anticipate any morning traffic
>>                  jam round 9am.
>> 
>> 2. first session: 9:30~10:00
>>    recommend to have tutorials as much as possible, primarily for overseas
>>    participants.
>> 
>>    examples  -  introduction/orientation on APrIGF, IGF, multistakeholder,..
>>                      - network neutrality and other new/hot topics
>>                      - introduction of national and regional IGF chapters
>> 
>> 3. plenary sessions
>>    opening plenary: second session on the first day 
>>    closing plenary:   fourth or third session on the third/last day
>>                               (depending on APrIGF MSG Meeting/General Assembly schedule)
>>    other plenary:      may have one plenary session every day in general.
>>                                if we don't have many good workshop proposals, we may have
>>                                two or more single track sessions which we may call plenary session.
>> 
>> 4. parallel sessions
>>    try to keep parallel sessions of two or more so that participants could find sessions they
>>    may be interested in.
>> 
>> then, we would have
>> 
>>   3 plenary 90-minutes sessions (or more) 
>>   9 90-minutes parallel sessions (with total of 18 parallel sessions(workshops) or more)
>> 
>> if we could select around 15 workshop proposals including tutorials, then we are in good shape.
>> remark: 2012 APrIGF in tokyo had 21 90-minutes sessions (8 plenaries, and 5 parallel sessions with
>>             total of 13 workshops)
>> 
>> chon
> 
> <smime.p7s>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program

_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program