[Rigf_program] Host 2014 Proposals Evaluation

[Hong Xue]

We are surely aware of the fact that India proposal was made first, but as
the Secretariat stated both were made "within the deadline."  We should, at
least, conduct a review procedurally according to the criteria set forth. I
assume Prof. Chon's suggestion could be a good start for the review and
assessment.

Hong


On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:13 AM, kilnam chon <chonkn at gmail.com> wrote:

> it is very good to have multiple proposals.  hope we could have good
> evaluation process this time.
>
> i would like to suggest the following to improve the proposals;
>
> 1. budget - both proposals
>     need to the income portion on the budget proposal.  this is
> particularly important
>     since the local host is financially accountable.
>
> 2. date - both proposals
>     does anybody have good information on 2014 IGF, in particular on the
> date; either
>     september, october,..?
>
>     i believe we would like to have around 2 months between IGF and
> APrIGF, but not
>     within one month.  does anybody have any idea on this matter as
> guideline?
>
>     how flexible are both proposal on the date; any particular constraint?
>
> 3. location - indian proposal
>     recommend to see the primary location for the proposal (with an
> optional
>     alternative location.  is Gore the primary location?
>
> 4. hotels - both proposals
>     would like to see the expected room charges of the 2 or 3 main hotels.
>
> 5. date of the proposals
>     as long as a proposal is submitted in timely manner, we may handle
> equally like
>     almost any other events in the world.
>
> 6. geographical diversity
>     we should pay good attention to the geographical diversity.  APrIGF
> has been held
>     in
>           three times in Northeast Asia (hong kong, tokyo, seuol), and
>           once in Southeast Asia (singapore).
>
>     i would like to see good geographical diversity as well as economical
> diversity
>     on APrIGF locations in the coming years.
>
> chon
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:11 AM, APrIGF Secretariat <sec at aprigf.asia>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Program Committee,
>>
>> Would like to make a clarification that we have received 1 more
>> additional proposal within the deadline. Therefore there are in total 2
>> proposals received from the below parties:
>> 1. ISPAI and NIXI, India
>> 2. Department of Computer Science, University of Philippines Cebu
>>
>> Attached both proposals for your reference.
>>
>> In that case, we Secretariat will go through both proposals and compile a
>> comparison sheet based on the set of selection criteria from the RFP and
>> circulate to the PC next Monday for further discussion during next meeting.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>  *Best Regards,*
>> *
>> *
>> *Yannis Li*
>> *Secretariat of APrIGF*
>> *DotAsia Organisation Ltd.*
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Address: 12F, Daily House, 35-37 Haiphong Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong
>> Tel: +852 5802 2500   ︳Fax: +852 5802 2502  ︳http://www.aprigf.asia<http://www.dot.asia>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rigf_program mailing list
>> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
>


-- 
Professor Dr. Hong Xue
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
Beijing Normal University
http://www.iipl.org.cn/
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130817/c1232bd1/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program