[Rigf_program] APrIGF: group/committees and mailing lists

[kilnam chon]

paul and all,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:

> Thanks Kilnam.
>
> I suggest that for the time being we consider the MSG and "program
> committee" to be one and the same, under the name "MSG".
>

agree with your proposal with reservation.
expect msg to discuss on this matter during msg/general assembly during
seoul aprigf.

assume you are msg chair and also program committee chair now.

chon


> My reason is that for both groups, a demonstrated multistakeholder
> approach must be taken, ensuring balance and diversity of participation.
>  This is not trivial to implement, and our operating principles have still
> not been well tested.  We don't have a great track record in the past, so
> we really do have to fix this and demonstrate both the commitment and the
> implementation.
>
> It will be much easier to achieve the required approach if we are dealing
> with a single group/list.  If we have 2 lists, I think the job gets quite a
> bit harder.
>
> I do agree in principle that we could split the MSG from the Program group
> in future, if this is generally felt to be necessary.
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
>
> On 27/04/2013, at 12:01 PM, kilnam chon <chonkn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > here is the proposal for APrIGF group and committee with their mailing
> lists (and website);
> >
> > 1. MSG
> >       " to support and ensure the proper conduct of the organizational
> work of the annual Asia Pacific Regional IGF,....................."
> >
> >     remark:  to select a site for annual APrIGF
> >                   to approve the proposal of annual APrIGF
> >                   to oversee the org work of annual APrIGF
> >                  (more)
> >
> > 2. "Program Committee"
> >      to be in charge of the program of the annual APrIGF
> >
> >    remark: this committee may be/may not be identical to MSG with
> >                 respect its membership.
> >
> >                 need to decide how to form PC.  i recommend MSG to
> >                 decide how to form PC including its chair.
> >
> > 3. domain name for APrIGF
> >     we should use either rigf.asia, OR aprigf.asia, but not both to
> avoid
> >     confusion. we even have ap.rigf.asia!
> >
> >     we have many xxxx.rigf.asia(2012.rigf, msg at rigf.asia proposal,..)
> >     as well as xxx.aprigf.asia(www.aprigf.asia,...)  now.
> >
> >     if we could not decide which one to decide, we should delete
> >     the domain name, msg at rigf.asia from the APrIGF OP.
> >
> > chon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> <APrIGF_DraftOP_Rev_0426.docx>_______________________________________________
> > Rigf_program mailing list
> > Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
> > https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130428/82e761be/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program