[Rigf_program] Further topic for the Tokyo agenda

[Keith Davidson]

+1

Keith

On 14/05/2012 9:45 a.m., Wu Kuo wrote:
> I love Hotta's idea. Why not just do it?
>
> Kuo Wu
>
> HiroHOTTA 於 2012/5/14 上午12:49 寫道：
>
>> Before the APrIGF meeting, how about conducting surveys on
>> how each country is active in IGF.  As an introduction of
>> national IGF report session, it may be good to show the
>> activeness/inactiveness of national IGF.  For example,
>> survey about the score (1-5) of the activity of each
>> stakeholder (government, civil society, company users,
>> consumer users, operators, ...) may be interesting.
>>
>> I know it is both good and bad to make it clear how each
>> country behave in IGF-like activity.  But I also think it
>> is worthwhile to analyze the activities of each national
>> IGF in our region, in order for each country to analyze
>> the reasons of it's inactiveness about IGF and how they
>> can focus on activating national activities.
>>
>> Hiro
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 13 May 2012 10:29:04 +0900
>> Izumi AIZU<iza at anr.org>  wrote:
>>> The Final version was v5, sent to this list.
>>> However it is just CFP not program itself, or do you mean the latest
>>> program?
>>> That was sent by Peng Hwa in Word format.
>>> We need to wait for May 24 deadline to acceptore proposals and then shape
>>> them to final as as evolving way.
>>>
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> 2012年5月13日日曜日 Wu Kuo kuoweiwu at gmail.com:
>>>
>>>> I just reply PengHwa's email. Where is the final version? or we still
>>>> modify it?
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Kuo Wu
>>>>
>>>> Hong Xue 於 2012/5/13 上午8:46 寫道：
>>>>
>>>>> It seems the discussions at the conference calls were not got through
>>>>> to the community, neither were the proposals circulated to the list.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Wu Kuo<kuoweiwu at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>> Here is my suggestion:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. For those countries running "local IGF in their societies", the
>>>> topic should be "how to raise the community to recognize the importance of
>>>> IGF for their society"? In stead of "sequential reports" (and I think, that
>>>> is not that many). I can talk about "what happen in Taiwan now" (although
>>>> not much, the society focus on very local political issue than
>>>> international global issue recently).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Such as "ICT for disaster", Japan already prepare to give a talk and
>>>> their action recently. Hopefully, there are some people willing to join the
>>>> discussion to share their experience. I know one person in Taiwan did a lot
>>>> of work in this issue when Taiwan had a big flooding killing thousand
>>>> people, and damaging hundreds of twins and people on  Aug. 8th, 2009. I try
>>>> to get him to join the session.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. "Confrontation on Internet", which we can have some one to describe
>>>> SOPA/PIPA in US congress, some one talk about the development on ACTA in
>>>> EC, and some one talk about the topic can be happened in IGF/Baku (Paul
>>>> might be a good person, since he is a member of MAG). As I know, Dr.
>>>> William Drake is coming to the APrIGF, he is a wright person to talk about
>>>> the possible political development in WCIT. If necessary, I can be the
>>>> moderator if no one want to be. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. Then we have to have a closing session to summary up what we have in
>>>> this meeting. Peng Hwa is the best person to do that and work it out. So he
>>>> can continue to report it in IGF/Baku for us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kuo Wu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ang Peng Hwa (Prof) 於 2012/5/12 下午5:23 寫道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed too. An issues-based panel would be more interesting than
>>>>>>> sequential reporting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The session would need a more pro-active and engaged panel chair.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/5/12 3:30 PM, "Paul Wilson"<pwilson at apnic.net>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree, a session on country IGF activities would be a good thing.
>>>> Can
>>>>>>>> we find out more precisely how many of those there will be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think the structure of the session deserves some thought - because
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> least interesting is to have a series of sequential free-form reports,
>>>>>>>> without preparation or structure.  Perhaps a panel-format with
>>>> discussion
>>>>>>>> organised by theme?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe we could have discussion not only of the content but of the form
>>>>>>>> and functioning of the IGF itself - i.e. gathering views on ongoing
>>>>>>>> direction/improvement of the event, and the whole "IGF system" such
>>>> as it
>>>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If this is planned in advance clearly enough, then that could also
>>>> inform
>>>>>>>> the national processes (or at least the panelists) in advance of the
>>>>>>>> meetings themselves (those that are yet to happen).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> paul
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2012, at 11:01 AM, Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Very good idea, Keith and Kuo Wu.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Izumi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2012年5月12日土曜日 Keith Davidson keith at internetnz.net.nz:
>>>>>>>>> Fully agree with these comments Kuo Wu. If we could have a
>>>> "reporting in
>>>>>>>>> session" from any countries and territories who have issues to
>>>> raise. I
>>>>>>>>> would think it would only be 5 minutes per country or per "in-country
>>>>>>>>> IGF" - raising only the 3 or 4 most significant issues for the local
>>>>>>>>> Internet community?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/05/2012 5:07 p.m., Wu Kuo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> My comment is : It is fine for those countries have its' own IGF to
>>>>>>>>> report their concern and comment. But it is al
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>>> Izumi Aizu<<
>>> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
>>> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
>>> Japan
>>> www.anr.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rigf_program mailing list
>> Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program