[Rigf_secretariat] [Rigf_program] Operating Framework for PC
Hong Xue
hongxueipr at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 17:14:54 HKT 2012
Dear All,
The IGF themes are good for our reference and I fully agree with Izumi
that we should have some "general tracks" on IGF improvement, EC and
IRPs, etc.
Meanwhile we may wish to prioritize the issues that are most important
and relevant to the Asia Pacific. IG4D is a big issue in AP region, as
raised by the others. CIRs (second-hand market of IPv4 and new gTLDs
from AP) and disaster relief are both regionally (as well as globally)
important. In addition, legal issues in the development of e-commerce
(such as privacy policy) may interest all the stakeholder groups--biz,
civil society and governments. If our discussion could reach certain
regional consensus (i.e. guidelines on personal data protection), then
it would really move toward the outcome-based IGF improvement.
Hong
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
> Miwa and all,
>
> Thank you for the very constructive suggestion and responses. Yes, it
> may be a good idea to have interactive session throughout with one
> consistent theme.
>
> One topic I can suggest is the "improvement" of the IGF, with the
> focus, perhaps, the linkage between national, regional and global IGF
> - how to enhance that. This might be a bit narrow, however.
>
> Another, more substantive theme can be Internet Right, or Internet
> Principles including, but not limited to the free flow of information.
>
> I am hesitant to make an "exclusive" meeting on important themes,
> however. IGF's basic principle is openness and multi-stakeholder.
>
> As for the thematic sessions, Disaster Communication is somehow put
> into "Emerging Issues", so I suggest we follow this framework,
> perhaps. I am happy to be the coordinator for that.
>
> For your reference, here is the link for the Final Report of the CSTD
> WG on IGF improvement, as I was one of the members.
>
> http://www.unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/a67d65_en.pdf
>
> I had attached the file, but this list limits the volume within 40 kb
> and thus returned as pending.
>
> MAG renewal will be announced shortly.
>
> best,
>
> 2012/4/17 Yoshihiro Obata <obatayoshihiro at eaccess.net>:
>> Dear Miwa-san and program committee members,
>>
>> I think it might be a good idea to have a session among executive speakers
>> to discuss the role and value of IGF activities. We might be able to find
>> someone in Japan who can coordinate the discussion. If we have Mr.La Rue,
>> somebody from IGF, somebody from ICANN, ISOC or IAB, which Vint Cerf
>> promised us to introduce due to his absence and some others, it might be a
>> good chance to enhance the role of APrIGF and get more resources to this
>> activity. It will also help Japan, where we see too much focus on
>> technology, in developing similar activities.
>> Considering the time left, we need to start coordination of executive guest
>> speakers as soon as possible. If you accept the idea of discussing IGF
>> activities, IGF-J will start coordinating speakers with help of Miwa-san.
>> We also plan to have an MIC executive and hopefully an industry executive
>> for opening speeches.
>>
>> Since we have proposed that IGF-Japan would like to have sessions on
>> disaster recovery, strong Internet infrastructure and child protection, we
>> might be able to coordinate these sessions under the Baku themes as follows.
>>
>> Internet Governance for Development
>> - disaster recovery
>> - strong Internet infrastructure
>> Emerging issues
>> none
>> Managing critical Internet resources
>> none
>> Security, openness and privacy
>> - child protection
>> Access and diversity
>> none
>>
>> If the idea is that we need a coordinator for each of the above themes,
>> IGF-J might be able to do the following.
>> I think that we do not have a big focus on the development of Internet in
>> underdeveloped countries in this region. If this is the case, we might be
>> able to have Aizu-san and some other IGF-J members to coordinate Internet
>> Governance for Development. We also have many achievements in privacy
>> issues especially related to child protection so that IGF-J might also be
>> able to coordinate Security, openness and privacy.
>> Additionally, we might also be able to provide contents for the following
>> themes as follows.
>> Access and diversity
>> - the Japanese guideline for filtering too large volume of traffic as abuse
>> of the network
>> Managing critical Internet resources
>> - experience in World IPv6 Launch
>>
>> I would also like to propose that we allocate the sessions to the rooms in
>> a way that
>> - the main room will cover important sessions of all themes on the first day
>> to get wide range of audience from Japan
>> - the 3 sub rooms will not have sessions on the same theme as the main room
>> at the same time
>>
>> We are going to have a IGF-J meeting tomorrow to discuss what we can do for
>> APrIGF other than logistics for the forum. Any quick feedback is welcome.
>> I will also report you the result of the meeting.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Yoshihiro Obata
>>
>>
>> (2012/04/17 1:26), Miwa Kubosaki wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Prof. Peng Hwa& Izumi-san et al.,
>>>
>>> Thank you for moving things forward. One thing I would like to suggest for
>>> the agenda is to allow some time allocated for interactive discussion across
>>> the three days. Perhaps, less number of presentations in each session, but
>>> more time not merely for Q& A but say, break-out session, group discussion
>>> that can report back to the entire audience. In this way, participants will
>>> have some chances to discuss ongoing& emerging issues face-to-face.
>>>
>>>
>>> I see that following, though with some flexibility, the themes set for
>>> global IGF in Baku would probably help us streamline our thinking towards
>>> the agenda.
>>>
>>> In terms of session speakers, chair etc., let me discuss with my
>>> colleagues& regional partners and come back to you, hopefully by mid-next
>>> week. I hope that this works.
>>>
>>>
>>> I also wanted to quickly share with you that I have been in touch with the
>>> UN independent expert, Frank La Rue (UN special rapporteur on Freedom of
>>> Expression and Opinion) to see if he could attend APrIGF for the first time.
>>> Nothing is confirmed at this moment, but as you may know, he has published a
>>> report on Internet rights last year that was well received around the world,
>>> and he has attended global IGFs at least for the past two-three years or
>>> longer. I will keep you posted whether Frank can come or not.
>>>
>>> I have also been in touch with some diplomatic missions in SE Asia to see
>>> if they or their colleagues can come attend APrIGF. This goes the same for
>>> some relevant UN missions in the region.
>>>
>>> I think these are it for now.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone,
>>> Miwa
>>>
>>> On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:11 AM, "Ang Peng Hwa
>>> (Prof)"<TPHANG at ntu.edu.sg<mailto:TPHANG at ntu.edu.sg>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Obata-san,
>>>
>>> Thank you for asking that question.
>>>
>>> The IGF themes should be taken as a guide. We used them in our APrIGF 1
>>> and I thought that was fine for a start. But for APrIGF 2 last year, we more
>>> or less abandoned that and went with issues that we thought we should
>>> address. Last year, disaster relief and the Arab Spring were just too much
>>> to ignore.
>>>
>>> I think that we should address issues that we consider to be significant
>>> in the AP region. Eg IPv6 transition is a major issue. APNIC has run out of
>>> IPv4 addresses but much of the content and equipment are only v4 compatible.
>>>
>>> The disaster relief theme, which was in the smallest parallel session
>>> (smallest by attendance) has got the most legs and the proposal is for it to
>>> be upgraded to a plenary. Personally, I pleased with that because it means
>>> the PC spotted and nurtured (with the help of the organiser Izumi) a
>>> significant issue.
>>>
>>> Having said that, the IGF themes are elastic: they can be stretched to
>>> cover most if not all issues we can think of.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Peng Hwa
>>>
>>> From:
>>> rigf_program-bounces at dotasia.org<mailto:rigf_program-bounces at dotasia.org>
>>> [mailto:rigf_program-bounces at dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Izumi AIZU
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 10 April, 2012 12:58 PM
>>> To: Yoshihiro Obata
>>> Cc: rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org<mailto:rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Rigf_program] Operating Framework for PC
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you Obata-san for the comment.
>>>
>>> The theme of the IGF 2012 is below (
>>> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2012/Programme%20Paper-1.02%20April%20copy.pdf
>>> ) and
>>>
>>> pasted here. These key themes will compose the tracks.
>>>
>>> Oveerall theme:‘ Internet Governance for Sustainable Human, Economic and
>>> Social Development’.
>>>
>>> The following key themes will provide the basic architecture of the
>>> detailed programme plan at the IGF in Baku:
>>>
>>> ・ IG4D / Internet governance for development (IG4D)
>>>
>>> ・ Emerging Issues
>>>
>>> ・ Managing critical Internet resources
>>>
>>> ・ Security, openness and privacy
>>>
>>> ・ Access and diversity
>>>
>>> ・ Taking stock and the way forward
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ** ***** **** ** **** **** **** *** ** * **** **********
>>>
>>> izumi
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012年4月10日火曜日 Yoshihiro Obata
>>> obatayoshihiro at eaccess.net<mailto:obatayoshihiro at eaccess.net>:
>>> Aizu-san,
>>>
>>> I think this is a good start.
>>> To agree on the structure and the process at the same time, can you
>>> elaborate what the tracks of IGF are this year? We need to understand
>>> how much of the existing proposals possibly fit within these tracks, how
>>> many coordinators we need, whether we have good coverage of the topics
>>> under the current active program committee members and some other issues
>>> so that the chair can move forward quickly.
>>>
>>> Yoshihiro Obata
>>>
>>> (2012/04/09 22:51), Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Peng Hwa, Hong and myself had opportunity to informally discuss about
>>>> the APrIGF and its program committee operation. We agreed to have
>>>> a minimum set of rules for the PC, as "operating framework" to make it
>>>> more open, sustainable and legitimate.
>>>>
>>>> Since we don't want to have too heavy and too formal procedure, it is of
>>>> minimal one.
>>>>
>>>> In the interest of the time, we hope to reach [rough] consensus by say
>>>> one week,
>>>> then conclude the Chair, and go on. We may not need to decide all the
>>>> details,
>>>> rather, we ca start with rough principle and make practical changes as we
>>>> learn
>>>> in "experimental" mode.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the proposal for the operating framework for the PC, reflecting
>>>> our
>>>> discussion. Let us hear your comments and hope to reach consensus
>>>> shortly.
>>>>
>>>> best,
>>>>
>>>> izumi
>>>>
>>>> ---------------
>>>> Operating Framework for the Program Committee of APrIGF
>>>>
>>>> Chair and Vice Chair
>>>> A Chair is elected by PC members and will preside the Program Committee.
>>>> Nomination period for 1 week, then call for consensus if there is
>>>> one nomination only, or vote if there are more than two candidates.
>>>>
>>>> The Chair may appoint a Vice Chair. The local organizer can also
>>>> appoint another Vice Chair.
>>>>
>>>> Vice Chairs will assist the Chair and in case of Chair's absence,
>>>> they will carry out the Chair's role.
>>>>
>>>> For the past two meetings, we have had Peng Hwa Ang as the default
>>>> Chair, and I like to nominate him for the third one as well.
>>>>
>>>> Decision of PC
>>>> The decision of PC shall be made by consensus of the members.
>>>> The Chair will declare the [rough] consensus. However, in exceptional
>>>> cases, such as when there is strong dissent within the PC, a Vote will
>>>> be called.
>>>>
>>>> Making of Program
>>>> Tracks that follow the global IGF themes with modifications
>>>> as appropriate to reflect the regional situation will be established
>>>>
>>>> A track will have one or two coordinators assigned by PC.
>>>> Coordinators are responsible for the implementation of the
>>>> programs within the track.
>>>>
>>>> An open call for Session/Speaker shall be issued.
>>>> A session covers the entire session with specific theme,
>>>> a few speakers etc. There can be a single speaker proposal/
>>>> nomination without specific session in mind. That proposal
>>>> will be synthesized into session/track by coordinators.
>>>>
>>>> A Session proposal should include:
>>>> - Track/theme
>>>> - Concise Description of the Session
>>>> - Proposed speakers with affiliation and bios
>>>> - Contact person
>>>>
>>>> A speaker proposal should include:
>>>> - Name of the Speaker with bio
>>>> - Title\theme of the speech
>>>> - Concise Description why he or she is recommended
>>>>
>>>> [END]
>>>> ---------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rigf_program mailing list
>>>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org<javascript:;>
>>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rigf_program mailing list
>>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org<javascript:;>
>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> >> Izumi Aizu<<
>>> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
>>> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
>>> Japan
>>> * * * * *
>>> www.anr.org<http://www.anr.org>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY:This email is intended solely for the person(s) named and
>>> may be confidential and/or privileged.If you are not the intended
>>> recipient,please delete it,notify us and do not copy,use,or disclose its
>>> content.
>>>
>>> Towards A Sustainable Earth:Print Only When Necessary.Thank you.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rigf_program mailing list
>>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org<mailto:Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org>
>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> >> Izumi Aizu <<
> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
> Japan
> * * * * *
> www.anr.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
--
Dr. Hong Xue
Professor of Law
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
Beijing Normal University
http://www.iipl.org.cn/
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
More information about the Rigf_secretariat
mailing list