[Rigf_secretariat] [Rigf_program] Operating Framework for PC

[Izumi AIZU]

Thank you Obata-san for the comment.

The theme of the IGF 2012 is below (
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2012/Programme%20Paper-1.02%20April%20copy.pdf)
and

pasted here. These key themes will compose the tracks.

Oveerall theme:‘ Internet Governance for Sustainable Human, Economic and
Social Development’.

 The following key themes will provide the basic architecture of the
detailed programme plan at the IGF in Baku:

   -

   IG4D / Internet governance for development (IG4D)
    -

   Emerging Issues
    -

   Managing critical Internet resources
    -

   Security, openness and privacy
    -

   Access and diversity
    -

   Taking stock and the way forward


   We don`t have to copy them all, but is a good reference.


izumi



2012年4月10日火曜日 Yoshihiro Obata obatayoshihiro at eaccess.net:

> Aizu-san,
>
>   I think this is a good start.
>   To agree on the structure and the process at the same time, can you
> elaborate what the tracks of IGF are this year?  We need to understand
> how much of the existing proposals possibly fit within these tracks, how
> many coordinators we need, whether we have good coverage of the topics
> under the current active program committee members and some other issues
> so that the chair can move forward quickly.
>
> Yoshihiro Obata
>
> (2012/04/09 22:51), Izumi AIZU wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Peng Hwa, Hong and myself had opportunity to informally discuss about
> > the APrIGF and its program committee operation. We agreed to have
> > a minimum set of rules for the PC, as "operating framework" to make it
> > more open, sustainable and legitimate.
> >
> > Since we don't want to have too heavy and too formal procedure,  it is of
> > minimal one.
> >
> > In the interest of the time, we hope to reach [rough] consensus by say
> > one week,
> > then conclude the Chair, and go on. We may not need to decide all the
> details,
> > rather, we ca start with rough principle and make practical changes as
> we learn
> > in "experimental" mode.
> >
> > Here is the proposal for the operating framework for the PC, reflecting
> our
> > discussion. Let us hear your comments and hope to reach consensus
> shortly.
> >
> > best,
> >
> > izumi
> >
> > ---------------
> > Operating Framework for the Program Committee of APrIGF
> >
> > Chair and Vice Chair
> > A Chair is elected by PC members and will preside the Program Committee.
> > Nomination period for 1 week, then call for consensus if there is
> > one nomination only, or vote if there are more than two candidates.
> >
> > The Chair may appoint a Vice Chair. The local organizer can also
> > appoint another Vice Chair.
> >
> > Vice Chairs will assist the Chair and in case of Chair's absence,
> > they will carry out the Chair's role.
> >
> > For the past two meetings, we have had Peng Hwa Ang as the default
> > Chair, and I like to nominate him for the third one as well.
> >
> > Decision of PC
> > The decision of PC shall be made by consensus of the members.
> > The Chair will declare the [rough] consensus. However, in exceptional
> > cases, such as when there is strong dissent within the PC, a Vote will
> > be called.
> >
> > Making of Program
> > Tracks that follow the global IGF themes with modifications
> > as appropriate to reflect the regional situation will be established
> >
> > A track will have one or two coordinators assigned by PC.
> > Coordinators are responsible for the implementation of the
> > programs within the track.
> >
> > An open call for Session/Speaker shall be issued.
> > A session covers the entire session with specific theme,
> > a few speakers etc. There can be a single speaker proposal/
> > nomination without specific session in mind. That proposal
> > will be synthesized into session/track by coordinators.
> >
> > A Session proposal should include:
> > - Track/theme
> > - Concise Description of the Session
> > - Proposed speakers with affiliation and bios
> > - Contact person
> >
> > A speaker proposal should include:
> > - Name of the Speaker with bio
> > - Title\theme of the speech
> > - Concise Description why he or she is recommended
> >
> > [END]
> > ---------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rigf_program mailing list
> > Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org <javascript:;>
> > https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org <javascript:;>
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
>

-- 
                        >> Izumi Aizu <<
          Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
           Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
                                  Japan
                                 * * * * *
                              www.anr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20120410/d8075b1c/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program