<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body>I agree with Paul's comments below. It would also be nice to see some new names and faces - which is why I chose not to put my name forward.<br>
<br>
Raj<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px">Waltraut, indeed this is true.<br /><br />All I can go on is the affiliation provided by the volunteer, however if there are dual or alternative affiliations, then this could change the balance.<br /><br />I think what we should be concerned about is whether the stated affiliation is substantial or "genuine". There is no point in going through this "multistakeholder" process if it does not represent true diversity. <br /><br />Paul.<br /><br /><br /><br />On 21/06/2013, at 1:57 PM, Waltraut Ritter <ritter@netvigator.com> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear Paul, <br /><br />Just wanted to mention that many people wear several hats, and could be<br />Civil Society, Private Sector, Technical/Academic and Government at the same<br />time. Quite common for individuals in t
he
internet society, isn't it?<br /><br />Regards, <br /><br />Waltraut<br /><br />-----Original Message-----<br />From: rigf_program-bounces@aprigf.asia<br />[mailto:rigf_program-bounces@aprigf.asia] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson<br />Sent: 21 June 2013 11:42<br />To: <rigf_program@ap.rigf.asia><br />Subject: Re: [Rigf_program] Selection Committee selection process<br /><br />Dear all,<br /><br />To clarify, there were additional volunteers as follows, who volunteered on<br />or before 14 June:<br /><br />Dongman Lee TA<br />Waltraut Ritter CS<br />Kilnam Chon TA<br />Ji-Young Li GV<br />Save Vocea TA<br /><br />However since we have only one PS (private sector) member on the list, we<br />cannot extend to more than 10 people in total, because this would reduce the<br />PS representation to less than 10%. <br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Paul.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />On 21/06/2013, at 1:19 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail
_quote"
style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear all<br /><br />Here is the list of volunteers for the selection panel:<br /><br />1. Shreedeep Rayamajhi, Nepal - CS<br />2. Fouad Bajwa, Pakistan - TA<br />3. Duangthip Chomprang, ISOC - TA<br />4. Hong Xue, China - TA<br />5. Ching Chiao - PS<br />6. Howoong Lee, South Korea - GV<br />7. YJ Park, South Korea - CS<br />8. Adam Peake - CS<br />9. Kuo We Wu - CS<br />10. Paul Wilson - TA<br /><br />Fortunately, the stakeholder distribution as as follows:<br /><br />Group Count Percentage<br />CS 4 40.00% (Civil Society)<br />TA 4 40.00% (Technical/Academic)<br />PS 1 10.00% (Private Sector)<br />GV 1 10.00% (Government)<br /><br /><br />Because a representation of 10-40% is allowed under the evaluation system,<br /></blockquote>this means that all volunteers can be accepted.<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8;
padding-left: 1ex;">Let's confirm at the meeting today the timeline for the selection process.<br /><br />Paul.</blockquote><br /><br /><br /></blockquote></pre><p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px"><hr /><br />Rigf_program mailing list<br />Rigf_program@aprigf.asia<br /><a href="https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program">https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Rajnesh D. Singh<br>
Asia-Pacific Bureau<br>
Internet Society</body></html></body></html>