<html><head></head><body>Agree with Izumi about the June 28 matter.<br>
<br>
Raj<br>
-- <br>
Rajnesh D. Singh<br>
Asia-Pacific Bureau<br>
Internet Society<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Izumi AIZU <iza@anr.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif">Thanks Yannis for this "reminder".<br /><br /><br />2012/6/21 Yoshihiro Obata <ObataYoshihiro@eaccess.net>:<br />> Dear MSG members,<br />><br />> Firstly, it is critical that we show the content of the sessions as soon<br />> as possible to get many people showing interest in the forum. Even for<br />> attendants from Japan, 3 weeks may not be enough to arrange their schedule.<br />> Thus, I suggest that we should fix the program by next Thursday and put it<br />> on the web site by Friday.<br /><br />May I add - while I agree we need to "finalize" the program asap, in<br />reality, some<br />of the speakers cannot be confirmed by June 28 for various reasons.<br />(ie, Japanese government speakers may take longer due to some possible<br />personnel change).<br /><br />So what I suggest is that the Session frameworks will be fixed, ie,<br />title, date, time, etc,
yet
details could remain unconfirmed until confirmed.<br />That 28th version will be published on the Web, used as the formal document.<br /><br />><br />> Secondly, I would like to confirm that we will fix the session allocation<br />> with Yannis's proposal. Since we already started issuing VISA application<br />> documents with the applicants travel itinerary and since many attendants<br />> will come to Japan for not all of the meeting, it will cause problems if we<br />> change the date and time for the sessions.<br /><br />Agree.<br /><br />><br />> I strongly support the idea of taking WCIT/ITU out from the title. What<br />> the coordinator and presenters are saying is that they do not like to give<br />> an impression that WCIT/ITU may control the Internet. Basically, the<br />> session will not be discussing whether we should put management of the<br />> Internet inside ITU regulations but it will be discussing how we shou
ld<br
/>> avoid government intervention to the Internet in a rather broad manner than<br />> focusing WCIT only. I think Rafik has agreed in taking it out from the<br />> title and we do not have any specific opinion so that we should take it out.<br /><br />I support this. I also spoke with Ministry guys in charge of WCIT/ITU and also<br />of Internet governance. The current approach seems best.<br /><br />I also agree the following proposals.<br /><br />best,<br /><br />izumi<br /><br /><br />><br />> Unfortunately, after negotiation among potential speakers, Dr.Fujikawa<br />> wants to withdraw the proposal of "Social Network Games and Law". As you<br />> might know, the issue is too hot among the newspapers in Japan and any open<br />> discussion may be communicated in a bad manner by the press. Due to lack of<br />> presenters for the ILO session, Dr.Fujikawa will put his presentation under<br />> the "Protection of Children from Crimes o
n the
Internet" and he will also<br />> replace the moderator. Mr.Kimura will stay as a coordinator but they are<br />> considering whether he will make any presentation. I will make sure that<br />> they will make the decision by the deadline.<br />><br />> Lastly, I would like to propose that we show the presenters and panel<br />> discussion speakers separately. Since many sessions will be constructed in<br />> a manner that we have 3 to 4 presentations but 7 to 8 people for the panel<br />> discussion, it is better to be clarified in the program.<br />><br />> Sincerely,<br />> Yoshihiro Obata<br />><br />><br />><br />> (2012/06/21 13:20), Yannis Li wrote:<br />><br />> Dear Program Committee,<br />><br />> Since there are many requests from session chairs about their time slot in<br />> order to accommodate their speakers respectively, I have rearranged the<br />> program schedule as attached based on th
e
requests and the topic<br />> consideration.<br />><br />> In short, changes made as below:<br />> - Plenary 3 (IPv6/4) and Plenary 4 (Law Enforcement) Exchanged<br />> - B3 (Freedom House) exchanged with C4 (SEAPA)<br />> - Remove "WCIT/ITU" from the topic?<br />><br />> I think we shall finalized this agenda these few days so that we can put it<br />> online and session chairs can really communicate with their speakers for<br />> necessary arrangement.<br />><br />> Following the previous email from Obata-san, we shall collect detail info<br />> about the agenda, confirmed speaker list from chairs by 28th June. I will<br />> send out emails to all chairs with Obata-san to collect the info separately.<br />><br />> Thank you.<br />><br />> Best Regards,<br />><br />> Yannis Li<br />> DotAsia Organisation Ltd.<br />><hr /><br />> Address: 15F, 6 Knutsford Terrace, Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong<br />> Tel: +85
2 3520
2635 ︳Fax: +852 3520 2634 ︳<a href="http://www.dot.asia">http://www.dot.asia</a><br />><br />><br />><br />><br />><br />><br />><br />><hr /><br />> Rigf_program mailing list<br />> Rigf_program@ap.rigf.asia<br />> <a href="https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program">https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program</a><br />><br />><br />><br />><br />><hr /><br />> Rigf_program mailing list<br />> Rigf_program@ap.rigf.asia<br />> <a href="https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program">https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program</a><br />><br /><br /><br /><br />-- <br /> >> Izumi Aizu <<<br />Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo<br />Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,<br />Japan<br /><a href="http://www.anr.org">www.anr.org</a><br /><br /><hr /><br />Rigf_program mailing list<br
/>Rigf_program@ap.rigf.asia<br /><a href="https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program">https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>