<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">+1<div><br></div><div>German<br><div><div>On 08/05/2012, at 5:31 PM, Izumi AIZU wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Let's go!<div><br></div><div>Izumi<span></span><br><br>2012年5月8日火曜日 Adam Peake <a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hong, great. <div><br><div>So we're good to go, Peng Hwa?</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br>Adam</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div>On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Hong Xue <span dir="ltr"><<a>hongxueipr@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks, Adam! Fully agree--thanks for adding CISPA. I made a little<br>
adjustment in the last sentence.<br>
<div><br>
> Meanwhile, the borderless nature of the Internet and the potential<br>
> extra-territorial impact of domestic legislative action was highlighted<br>
> earlier this year when the U.S. proposed tough laws aimed at preventing the<br>
> theft of copyright materials online; laws which would have made Internet<br>
> users world-wide vulnerable to U.S. law. The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)<br>
> and the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) were proposed, but action<br>
> by citizens and businesses stopped them becoming law.<br>
<br>
Some are now concerned that new domestic legislation, such as the U.S.<br>
</div>Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) may have a<br>
similar global impact as international treaties, such as<br>
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) or pending Trans-Pacific<br>
Partnership Agreement (TPP).<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
Hong<br>
</font></span><div><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Adam Peake <<a>ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi all.<br>
><br>
> Hong, sorry, as I mentioned I'd tried not to touch the substance of the<br>
> section you mentioned, not an expert and thought you might send some text.<br>
> However, how's this:<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
><br>
</div><div><div>> (it's a bit of a clumsy read)<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Adam<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Ang Peng Hwa (Prof) <<a>TPHANG@ntu.edu.sg</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hong,<br>
>><br>
>> Sorry but could you mark up the draft correcting the error?<br>
>><br>
>> I hope we can get it out by the end of today.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Peng Hwa<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: Hong Xue [mailto:<a>hongxueipr@gmail.com</a>]<br>
>> Sent: Tuesday, 8 May, 2012 8:59 AM<br>
>> To: Ang Peng Hwa (Prof)<br>
>> Cc: Izumi AIZU; Adam Peake; APrIGF PC<br>
>> Subject: Re: [Rigf_program] Conference Call: Friday May 4, 2012<br>
>><br>
>> Hi, my comments were not considered and that paragraph has two<br>
>> materials errors still, as stated in my previous email.<br>
>><br>
>> Hong<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ang Peng Hwa (Prof) <<a>TPHANG@ntu.edu.sg</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>> > Hi all.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I have accepted the changes of Adam's draft and incorporated the<br>
>> > bulleted<br>
>> > points in Izumi's draft.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Also, the name of the file is shortened. The acronym CFP is probably a<br>
>> > good contraction because it sounds akin to "Call for Papers" or "Call<br>
>> > for<br>
>> > Proposals" that we are familiar with.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Note that I have put the deadline as midnight of Thursday May 24 as I am<br>
>> > anticipating a conference call on Friday May 25.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > May I suggest that we let the document "sit" for one day and then send<br>
>> > it<br>
>> > out the end of the work day May 8?<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Hiro,<br>
>> > You are technically right that the correct title should be "to shape"<br>
>> > the<br>
>> > APrIGF.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I have not changed the title though because it is also not wrong to use<br>
>> > the title because a call for papers is also a call to shape a<br>
>> > conference.<br>
>> > Given that "common error", it is better to go with the common<br>
>> > understanding. Also, our call for participation is also a call for<br>
>> > attendance.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Regards,<br>
>> > Peng Hwa<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On 7/5/12 9:24 PM, "Izumi AIZU" <<a>iza@anr.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br> >> Izumi Aizu <<<br>Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo<br>Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita, <br>Japan<br><a href="http://www.anr.org/" target="_blank">www.anr.org</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>Rigf_program mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Rigf_program@ap.rigf.asia">Rigf_program@ap.rigf.asia</a><br>https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>