[Rigf_program] contribution on national/regional IGFs to IGF open consultation May 21

[Adam Peake]

Hi Asif,

Sorry, I don't understand what you are suggesting.  Could you send some
text.

Thanks,

Adam



On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Kabani <kabani.asif at gmail.com> wrote:

> Adam,
>
> Many thanks for sharing, suggestion that para 2 need re-written in
> contexts of IGF and WSIS principles, example Markus  Kummer, ISOC and Bill
> Graham, ICANN and other participants in WSIS 2013 this week also supported
> the National and Regional IGFs. Suggestion is that let IGF give the process
> and guidelines, your suggestion and process are much appreciated. The
> suggestion are my personal views on the subject.
>
> Sincerely
>
> @Kabaniasif
>
> *Asif Kabani, MBA*
> *
> *
> *Connect @*
> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/kabani.asif> [image: Twitter]<https://twitter.com/Kabaniasif>
>  [image: Youtube] <http://www.youtube.com/user/asifkabani> [image:
> LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kabani>
> *Before you print - Think about the** **ENVIRONMENT*
>
>
>
> On 15 May 2013 12:42, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Unless there are any objections, I propose to sent the following text
>> on national/regional IGFs as a contribution from us to the open
>> consultation.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> Proposal for a National and Regional IGF session, Bali IGF.
>> Contribution from the APrIGF multi-stakeholder steering committee, for
>> the IGF open consultation, 21 May 2013, Geneva.
>>
>>
>> There should be a session in Bali to allow national/regional IGFs to
>> share and discuss information about the outcomes of their meetings.
>>
>> We suggest that the coordinators of each national/regional activity
>> are invited to join a coordinating group, which will work with the MAG
>> and IGF Secretariat to arrange the session.
>>
>> The coordinating group should prepare a standard reporting format.
>> Reports of each national/regional activity should be prepared in
>> advance of the session and made available on the IGF website. The
>> coordinating group will produce an initial analysis of the
>> regional/national IGFs reports submitted. The analysis will be an
>> input for the dialogue.  Each report can be briefly introduced during
>> a "reporting-in" part of the session.
>>
>> We emphasize that the main purpose of the session should be to allow
>> discussion between the respective national/regional activities.
>> Reporting-in from the national/regional IGFs should be kept to a
>> minimum. Discussion should seek to identify the commonality of views
>> across the different regions/countries, and at the same time identify
>> the unique elements that arise from each process.
>>
>> Based on the input reports, initial analysis and discussion, an
>> outcome report identifying areas of commonality and difference should
>> be prepared by the coordinating group as an output of the session. The
>> outcome report will go beyond identification/comparison to provide a
>> more substantive analysis; for example on common challenges faced,
>> different/local interpretations of same topics, etc.
>>
>> Session features:  a substantive session that focuses on dialogue not
>> reporting.  Written reports, to a pre-agreed format, required from
>> each process must be submitted before the Bali IGF.  Brief
>> reporting-in from each national/regional activity important.  Session
>> outcome report to be prepared.
>>
>> END
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rigf_program mailing list
>> Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dotasia.org/pipermail/rigf_secretariat/attachments/20130515/1e8f9714/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at aprigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program