[Rigf_program] Further topic for the Tokyo agenda

[Keith Davidson]

Fully agree with these comments Kuo Wu. If we could have a "reporting in 
session" from any countries and territories who have issues to raise. I 
would think it would only be 5 minutes per country or per "in-country 
IGF" - raising only the 3 or 4 most significant issues for the local 
Internet community?

Cheers

Keith

On 11/05/2012 5:07 p.m., Wu Kuo wrote:
> My comment is : It is fine for those countries have its' own IGF to report their concern and comment. But it is also fine to figure out the regional common interest or special issues. If you can share how NZ work on your own IGF, it is good experience sharing to others. :-)
>
> Kuo Wu
>
>
>
> 從我的 iPhone 傳送
>
> Keith Davidson<keith at internetnz.net.nz>  於 2012/5/11 12:20 寫道：
>
>> Hi Peng Hwa and all,
>>
>> I was wondering if it might be considered useful to have a session
>> marked down for reporting in on other "in-country" or sub-regional IGFs
>> from around the AP region? For example, NZ is convening its IGF the week
>> before the APrIGF - as is Japan also, I think - so I think it could be
>> of some use to have reports from those who have had an IGF, or will have
>> an IGF in the near future, to advise what the major issues arising were etc.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Keith
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rigf_program mailing list
>> Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>
_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at ap.rigf.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program