[Rigf_secretariat] [Rigf_program] Consensus Call for The Chair of PC/MSG

Wu Kuo kuoweiwu at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 16:42:30 HKT 2012


I am fine for the decision, but wish to have people from "different culture" as China/Vice Chair for the next year.

Kuo Wu

Keith Davidson 於 2012/4/24 下午3:42 寫道:

> I would like to endorse Peng Hwa's choice of Hong Xue as Vice Chair.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Keith
> 
> On 21/04/2012 9:05 p.m., Ang Peng Hwa (Prof) wrote:
>> Thank you everyone for appointing me as chair.
>> 
>> 
>> I think I speak for everyone on this list that we really believe in the
>> need for an AP meeting to discuss Internet governance issues.
>> 
>> Special thanks to Izumi Aizu for addressing the governance issue through
>> this arrangement.
>> 
>> And also to Paul for a suggestion that was quickly adopted. Can't say the
>> MSG name is culturally out of place.
>> 
>> For the Vice-Chair, may I propose Hong Xue. Many of us in the group know
>> her. At this time, the need is for programming the meeting and Hong had
>> organized an Internet governance training session at her university last
>> year. Plus we have worked together. She also has a reasonably high profile
>> in the Internet governance arena, serving in ICANN.
>> 
>> For your consideration.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Peng Hwa
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 21/4/12 12:26 AM, "Miwa Kubosaki"<kubosaki at freedomhouse.org>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks everyone, and Hiro-san, Izumi-san, Paul et al.
>>> 
>>> Thank you Izumi-san for coming up with the structure&  function of the
>>> PC/MSG - very helpful to know.
>>> 
>>> I am personally fine with Prof. Ang Peng Hwa to be the chair.
>>> 
>>> Regarding the name of this group (PC or MSG etc.), personally, either
>>> would be fine with me - as Paul&  Izumi-san mentioned, it's more about
>>> what this group can achieve in run up to APrIGF and during/(after?) the
>>> event, as well as in terms of both quality&  quantity (outreach etc.).
>>> But, I think that some of you would know much better than I do in terms
>>> of political meaning of either term and sensibility in using one of the
>>> terms over another.
>>> 
>>> I also very much appreciate that some friends specified that we do not
>>> want "top-down" or "exclusive" approach, since the goal of IGF process is
>>> multi-stakeholder and open dialogue.  Please know that my colleagues&
>>> partners also very much agree with this, and so thank you.
>>> 
>>> I understand that we will now be collecting a consensus on to-be
>>> vice-chair, and so looking forward to hearing an update on that.
>>> 
>>> In the meantime, as I shared earlier this week or last week, my
>>> colleagues, partners and I are discussing to share with you all our
>>> preliminary ideas for a few possible sessions for APrIGF under a few of
>>> those IGF-Baku themes.  We are hoping to do this by the end of next week
>>> (week of April 22) if not, sometime in the following week.  I hope that
>>> this&  similar work by other friends would help keep our discussion
>>> moving forward and to hear from you some feedback.
>>> 
>>> Thank you everyone,
>>> Miwa
>>> 
>>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes I support this approach...
>>>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  (CLO)
>>>>  http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 19 April 2012 20:00, Rajnesh D. Singh<singh at isoc.org>  wrote:
>>>> Sounds fine.
>>>> 
>>>> Raj
>>>> ISOC
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>> 
>>>> Izumi AIZU<iza at anr.org>  wrote:
>>>> May I confirm that the Chair of the Program Committee (or modified
>>>> to "Multistakeholder Steering Group") for APrIFG 2012 will be Prof,
>>>> 
>>>> Peng Hwa Ang?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Then, as I proposed, The Chair will nominate one Vice Chair, and local
>>>> host will nominate one Vice Chair. Is that also OK?
>>>> 
>>>> Unless we hear strong objection within 48 hours, I propose that this is
>>>> closed.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Of course, we like to see some more proactive endorsement, as well.
>>>> 
>>>> After that, we can enter or continue the substantive discussion on the
>>>> program organization. The local team in Tokyo had a meeting yesterday,
>>>> 
>>>> and I will give your some report and their tentative proposal early
>>>> 
>>>> next week.
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> 
>>>> izumi
>>>> 
>>>> Rigf_program mailing list
>>>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
>>>> 
>>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rigf_program mailing list
>>>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
>>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> <ATT00001..txt>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rigf_program mailing list
>>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
>>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>> 
>> 
>> CONFIDENTIALITY:This email is intended solely for the person(s) named and may be confidential and/or privileged.If you are not the intended recipient,please delete it,notify us and do not copy,use,or disclose its content.
>> 
>> Towards A Sustainable Earth:Print Only When Necessary.Thank you.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rigf_program mailing list
>> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
>> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rigf_program mailing list
> Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
> https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program


_______________________________________________
Rigf_program mailing list
Rigf_program at web2.dotasia.org
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/rigf_program



More information about the Rigf_secretariat mailing list